Thursday, June 21, 2012

'Breaking Dawn' Trailer: Where Is Renesmee?

New clip gives fans a precious — though tantalizingly brief — glimpse at the newest member of the Cullen family.
By Kara Warner


Kristen Stewart in "Twilight: Breaking Dawn - Part 2"
Photo:

So how about that new "Twilight: Breaking Dawn- Part 2" trailer? Now that we've watched it a few dozen times, we can take a step back to analyze our favorite moments.

First, how great is it to finally get a glimpse of all those other vampires we've been talking about? Finally a first look at Garrett the nomad, played by the divine Lee Pace, as well as Benjamin, Irina and a few others.

But there's one character we wish we saw a little bit more of: Renesmee. Not that we blame Summit and Co. for waiting to reveal more of little Mackenzie Foy-as-Renesmee closer to the film's release, but it would have been nice to see her in action with her parents, interacting with the other Cullens or playing with Jacob.

The moments that we do get to see are very sweet. Fans around the world have been expressing their delight over one scene in particular: when Bella is putting her daughter to bed and tells her "I'll never let anybody hurt you."

"The way vampire Bella looks at Renesmee reminds me of Edwards quote from Twilight... 'You are my life now' :')," one Mackenzie Foy fan tweeted. A fellow fan called the moment "10 seconds of perfection."

In addition to the high praise from fans, that tender moment between mother and daughter has already been given the GIF treatment on several Tumblr blogs.

With all this love for the happy family and that precocious young lady Renesmee, we surely hope we'll get to see more of her in the next trailer.

Check out everything we've got on "The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2."

For young Hollywood news, fashion and "Twilight" updates around the clock, visit HollywoodCrush.MTV.com.

supreme court lawrence o donnell magic johnson jetblue pilot solicitor general neighborhood watch dennis rodman

Tablet Computers Can Help Your Small ... - Boyer Technologies

Tablet Computers Can Help Your Small Business

You are doing everything you can for your organization. You have a website and a blog. You are getting your name out there via social media sites. So now you hear that you need a tablet to really help your organization thrive. But tablets are expensive and you are not actually sure why you would need one or how it could be useful.

Reasons You Need a Tablet

It may come as a shock, but using a tablet can be very good for your small business. We have outlined some of the reasons below.

  1. Amazing presentations: In the present topsy-turvy economy, finding faithful clients is no easy task. Consumers today are holding firmly onto their dollars. However, armed with a tablet computer, you can wow the most tight-fisted of customers. Say you own a landscaping company. When you arrive at a possible client?s home for a business meeting, you can fire up your tablet and quickly show them before-and-after photos of your most current landscaping jobs. This visual evidence?all displayed without needing to boot up a more burdensome laptop computer?might help you land a worthwhile new client.
  2. State-of-the-Art: Being up-to-date in the world of technology can wow possible clients. And, these days, tablets seem to be on the cutting edge of technology. This is applicable to most fields, but particularly in the fields of marketing or technology. Consumers are reassured when a person who works with technology is up on the latest and greatest.
  3. Information at your fingertips: Say you?re a real estate agent trying to determine how much your clients should offer for that house on the corner. With your tablet computer, you can instantly discover that the home three doors down sold for $250,000 recently. Equipped with this information, you can confidently advise your clients, and you can rest assured that your clients will tell their friends and family members that you used actual market information when advising them.
  4. Signing documents is a breeze: To close a deal, you might need your clients to sign important documents. Thanks to several easy-to-use applications that you can download to your tablet, there?s no longer any need to fuss with reams of paper that can easily be lost. Rather, pull up your documents on your tablet and have your customers sign the paperwork right on the screen. You can then easily email it to the people that need it.

sonny rollins sweet caroline lottery winning numbers pro bowl roster quirky chrissy teigen chia seeds

Lisa Loeb welcomes second child

Fred Prouser / Reuters file

By Us Weekly

Lisa Loeb has something new to sing about! The 44-year-old performer -- best known for her 1994 hit "Stay (I Missed You)" -- welcomed her second child, a baby boy named Emet Kuli Loeb Herskovitz, Friday in Los Angeles, her rep confirms to Us Weekly.

PHOTOS: Most buzzed-about celeb pregnancies

New arrival Emet -- who weighed in at 7 lbs., 7 oz. and is 20 inches long -- joins big sister Lyla Rose, 2 1/2.

PHOTOS: Celeb moms' top parenting tips

Also an author and eyewear designer, Loeb married "Conan" music production supervisor Roey Hershkovitz in January 2009.

jason smith jon corzine austin rivers austin rivers sweet home alabama etch a sketch the host

Cheap, Affordable Bankruptcy Without Lawyers ? Beat the New ...

Higher Bankrupt Costs Since the New Law, So How Can Debtors Get Cheap Affordable Bankruptcy Without Lawyers?

WHY THE NEW BANKRUPTCY LAW WAS ENACTED

On October 18, 2005, the new bankruptcy law, called the ?Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Prevention Act of 2005? (BAPCPA), went into effect in the United States. At that time, there was no anticipation that a rising higher bankruptcy costs would sooner result with the new law. However, recent reports find that the new law brought such results, and that there are more American debtors going bankruptcy without lawyers.

The new law had been prompted principally by the general clamor and intense outcry and lobbying of the well-financed, well-organized, and properly connected but powerful, American banking and credit card industries and the bankruptcy lawyers, who had contended that the old bankruptcy law was supposedly ?too soft on debtors,? and that the ?excessive generosity? of the old bankruptcy system supposedly encouraged abuse and allowed many undeserving debtors who, they said, could well have afforded to pay their debts, to take undue advantage by using Chapter 7 bankruptcy to avoid repaying their debts.

That claim was NOT at all true. In deed, almost every credible study that had been conducted on the subject, and most experts that testified before Congress, had held otherwise. However, Congress disregarded such evidence. In stead, it promptly responded by passing the BAPCPA law, any way.

In consequence, the stated and yet unmistakable purpose of this law was essentially to discourage debtors from filing bankruptcy by making it more stringent and expensive to file. The new law was to do that by forcing people who, it was said, could actually ?afford? (through a determination by a complex ?means test? calculation) to repay some of their debts, into filing for bankruptcy under Chapter 13, instead of under Chapter 7 ? that is, the type of bankruptcy (Chapter 13) which requires that the debtor will repay at least some, if not most or all, of their debts.

HAS THE NEW LAW ATTAINED ITS ORIGINAL OBJECTIVE?

But lo and behold, today, it is now some 5 years later into the new bankruptcy law. The actual results and effects of the new law are just beginning to emerge. And the question is: has the BAPCPA law actually attained the basic objective for which it had supposedly been originally designed?

Actually, on one major goal of the law ? the goal of discouraging debtors from filing bankruptcy and drastically curtailing the rise in bankruptcy filings by debtors ? the BAPCPA law has, to date, turned out to be a woeful failure. In deed, as we speak today, there is a NEAR RECORD RISE IN BANKRUPTCY FILING. For example, in the 12-month period ending June 30, 2010, bankruptcy filings rose 20 percent, according to statistics released by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. A total of 1,572,597 bankruptcy cases were filed nationwide in that period, compared to 1,306,315 bankruptcy cases filed in the previous 12-month period ending June 30, 2009, making it the highest number of filings for any period since the BAPCPA law went into effect in October 2005.

How the New Law Has Made Bankruptcy More Cumbersome and Costly for Debtors

It is, however, on the second major consequence caused by the law, that its impact has become far more profound for the average debtor or bankruptcy filer. Namely, on the fact that the new law has made bankruptcy far more cumbersome for the debtors, and has simply brought rising higher bankruptcy costs, causing debtors to seek cheap affordable bankruptcy without lawyer.

Historically, the ability of the average debtor reasonably to file for bankruptcy and to be reasonably discharged of his/her debt burden, and to obtain a fresh start to begin life anew relatively unhindered by the past debts, has been a fundamental but vital and long-standing part of the American law and life. In deed, that right is one of a handful of fundamental rights specifically named by the original U.S. Constitution and guaranteed under it. However, contrary to that fundamental American value, the new bankruptcy law of 2005 introduces into the bankruptcy system, perhaps for the first time ever, elements which drastically limit the extent of the exercise and enjoyment of this basic right by the average debtor. It does this by placing an array of new hurdles, financial as well as legal, on the path of the overburdened American debtor who seeks the ?fresh start? protection that bankruptcy has traditionally offered the American debtor.

Some Examples of How the New Law Has Done this. The new law:

? Now makes it harder for debtors to discharge certain types of debts.

? Forces a greater proportion of debtors to repay their debts.

? Imposes special responsibilities and restrictions uncommon even on bankruptcy lawyers and Bankruptcy Paper Preparers (e.g., lawyers are now required to personally vouch for the accuracy of the debt and financial information their debtor clients provide them, and to do more paperwork ), handing lawyers an excuse to jack up their fees for bankruptcy even higher than before.

? Imposes tremendous restrictions and undue scrutiny upon the Bankruptcy Paper Preparers (the name given by the Bankruptcy Code for non-lawyers who help debtors with their bankruptcy paperwork), the net result of which has now been to discourage affordable assistance for bankruptcy filers and thus chase them into the offices of bankruptcy lawyers who charge some 50 times the fee of the BPPS to do basically the same thing for the debtor.

? Require debtors to undergo credit and budget counseling, and

? Subject bankruptcy filers to a mountain of paperwork, documentation and procedures that could be quite daunting for anyone, in order to file for bankruptcy.

EExorbitant Lawyers? Fees for bankruptcy Filers the Biggest

Consequence of the New Law

Today, some 5 years after the operation of the new BAPCPA law, it is almost crystal clear now that the biggest consequences of these new array of hurdles brought about by the new law on the American debtor, is that there has been rising higher bankruptcy costs with the new law and an exorbitant lawyers? fees for bankruptcy filers, and which has caused the debtor to seek cheap affordable bankruptcy without lawyer

Bankrupt Cost Higher

For example, according to a study released in January 2010 by Katherine Porter, associate professor of law at the University of Iowa, and her colleague, Ronald Mann, a professor of law at Columbia University, titled ?Save on Bankruptcy fees,? (primarily because attorney fees and court filing fees have risen so dramatically under the new law) most debtors in current times simply find it too expensive to file for bankruptcy. For example, the average lawyers? fee for a simple bankruptcy in parts of the country today, has reportedly shut up to a whopping sum of $2,500 for a simple Chapter 7 bankruptcy, and about $4,500 for a Chapter 13, among other new complications now to be confronted by the debtor who wishes to file for bankruptcy.

But Don?t Despair. There are Still Some Available Low-cost, Affordable Options for Debtors to File Bankruptcy!

Now, true, for many a debtor the new law has brought rising higher bankrupt costs. But, as a debtor wanting to file bankruptcy, how do you remedy this major hurdle? That may mean, for example, how do you get cheap affordable bankruptcy without lawyers? Actually, one answer seems to be that the American debtors and consumers have become increasingly adept at finding a ?new? alternative for getting their bankruptcy filing needs done ? AFFORDABLY.

One such major legitimate option and excellent alternative open to debtors under the U.S. Bankruptcy law, and which is now becoming increasingly ?popular? among them as their way to file bankruptcy, is the use by debtors of low-cost, cheap, non-lawyer helpers to assist the bankruptcy filers with their bankruptcy paperwork. Called Bankruptcy Paper Preparers or BPP under the bankruptcy law, these helpers are often skilled paralegals. The better ones among them, when correctly selected, are specially trained and experienced specialists in the bankruptcy process, often exactly the same paralegals that bankruptcy lawyers employ in their own offices in doing the bankruptcy work for their debtor clients.

Stephen Elias, a California attorney and bankruptcy specialist and author of several books on the subject, summed up this fact and trend this way: ?Surveys have shown that many attorneys have doubled their fees to cope with new requirements imposed by the BAPCPA of 2005. Many thousands of debtors have therefore been priced out of lawyer representation in their bankruptcies.?

Hence, adds Elias: ?Because of rules governing the practice of law, the only legal alternative to attorney representation is self representation? Bankruptcy Petition Preparers can assist with your paperwork.?

NEED MORE INFORMATION?

As a debtor wishing to file affordable bankruptcy, how do you remedy the problem of the rising higher bankruptcy costs of the 2005 law? How do you get cheap affordable bankruptcy without lawyer, or with lawyer? For more information on how a growing number of dabtors specifically end the ?too broke to even declare bankruptcy syndrome? problem by using low-cost non attorney assistance, such as a good federally-approved Debt Relief Agency or Bankruptcy Paper Preparer, to secure your Constitutional right to bankruptcy protection, please visit this site: http://www.afford-bankruptcy.com/proSeBankruptcyTrend.html

====================================================================

Cheap, Affordable Bankruptcy Without Lawyers - Beat the New Higher Bankruptcy Costs and Save on Fees

Benjamin Anosike, Ph.D., has been dubbed by experts and reviewers of his many books, manuals and body of work, which dwell largely on self-help law issues, as ?the man who almost literally wrote the book on the use of self-help law methods? by America?s consumers in doing their own routine legal chores ? in uncontested divorce, will-making, simple probate, settlement of a dead person?s estate, simple no-asset bankruptcy, etc.

A pioneer and intellectual and moral leader of the 1970s-based ?you do your own law? movement and a lifelong vehement advocate and veteran of historical battles for the right of the American consumers to perform their own tasks in the area of routine legal matters, Anosike was one of the pioneers who fought and survived (along with many others of courage) the lawyers? and organized bar?s stiff war of the 1970s and ?80s against American consumers and entrepreneurs who merely sought, then, to use, write, distribute or sell law-related self-help books and kits for non-lawyers to do their own law, upon the lawyers? claim then of such being purportedly ?unauthorized practice of law? or ?practicing law without a license.? Anosike holds graduate degrees in labor economics and management and a Ph.D. in jurisprudence.

Once characterized by a review of the American Library Association?s Booklist Journal as ?probably the most prolific author in the field of legal self-help today,? Dr Anosike is the author of over 26 books and manuals (and countless number of articles) on various topics of American law, including 4 volumes on personal and business bankruptcy filing, in a lifetime of dedication. For more on the subject matter discussed in this article, or on how to get a low-cost, affordable bankruptcy filing, or the author?s other books and manuals, visit this site: [http://www.Afford-Bankruptcy.Com]

Content About : Cheap, Affordable Bankruptcy Without Lawyers ? Beat the New Higher Bankruptcy Costs and Save on Fees Article

-- Download Cheap, Affordable Bankruptcy Without Lawyers - Beat the New Higher Bankruptcy Costs and Save on Fees as PDF --


gia la riots new jersey devils torn acl derrick rose injury st louis news utah jazz

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Developing countries to the rescue at G-20

Leaders of the G-20 and guests pose for the family photo in Los Cabos, Mexico, Monday, June 18, 2012. From left, Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard, Spain?s Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy, President Barack Obama, Germany?s Chancellor Angela Merkel, Cambodia?s Prime Minister Hun Sen, China?s President Hu Jintao, India?s Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Colombia?s President Juan Manuel Santos, Mexico?s President Felipe Calderon, British Prime Minister David Cameron and Chile?s President Sebastian Pinera. (AP Photo/Eduardo Verdugo)

Leaders of the G-20 and guests pose for the family photo in Los Cabos, Mexico, Monday, June 18, 2012. From left, Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard, Spain?s Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy, President Barack Obama, Germany?s Chancellor Angela Merkel, Cambodia?s Prime Minister Hun Sen, China?s President Hu Jintao, India?s Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Colombia?s President Juan Manuel Santos, Mexico?s President Felipe Calderon, British Prime Minister David Cameron and Chile?s President Sebastian Pinera. (AP Photo/Eduardo Verdugo)

China's President Hu Jintao listens the opening speech by Mexico's President Felipe Calderon during the first plenary session of the G-20 Summit in Los Cabos, Mexico, Monday, June 18, 2012. (AP Photo/Andres Leighton)

Leaders of the G-20 and guests pose for the family photo in Los Cabos, Mexico, Monday, June 18, 2012. Front row from left, France?s President Francois Hollande, Argentina?s President Cristina Fernandez, Indonesia?s President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, U.S. President Barack Obama, China?s President Hu Jintao, Mexico?s President Felipe Calderon, South Korea?s President Lee Myung-bak, South Africa?s President Jacob Zuma, Brazil?s President Dilma Rousseff, Russia?s President Vladimir Putin. Middle row from left, European Commission?s President Jose Manuel Barroso, Italy?s Prime Minister Mario Monti, Turkey?s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Australia?s Prime Minister Julia Gillard, Germany?s Chancellor Angela Merkel, India?s Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, British Prime Minister David Cameron, Canada?s Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Japan?s Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda, European Council President Herman Van Rompuy, Saudi Arabia Minister of Finance Ibrahim bin Abdulaziz Al-Assaf. Back row from left, Chairman of the Financial Stability Board Mark Carney, OECD Secretary General Jose Angel Gurria, World Bank?s President Robert Zoellick, FAO Director-General Jose Graziano da Silva, Spain?s Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy, Cambodia?s Prime Minister Hun Sen, Colombia?s President Juan Manuel Santos, Chile?s President Sebastian Pinera, Benin?s President Boni Yayi, Ethiopia?s Prime Minister Meles Zenawi, United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Director-General of the International Labour Organization Juan Somavia, IMF?s Managing Director Christine Lagarde, WTO Director General Pascal Lamy. (AP Photo/Andres Leighton)

LOS CABOS, Mexico (AP) ? The scene at the just-concluded Group of 20 summit held in this seaside resort would have been unthinkable a decade ago: Hundreds of dignitaries gathered in opulent Mexican hotels and convention halls to hammer out an economic bailout for Europe. Meanwhile, the leaders of Brazil and China kicked in tens of billions of dollars to the International Monetary Fund to rescue downtrodden Spain and Greece.

Although the gathering didn't produce a solution for the ailing euro zone, it did outline the globe's new balance of power. Developing countries projected optimism and wealth over the summit's two days, while European and U.S. leaders struggled just to stay solvent.

A lot has clearly changed since the 1990s, when Asian and Latin American economies were slogging through recessions while Washington-based power brokers ordered up the very kind of austerity-minded prescriptions now sparking street protests in Europe.

Even during recent economic crises in the U.S. and Europe, China has been posting annual growth rates topping 8 percent. Countries with booming Chinese trade, such as Argentina and Ethiopia, have similarly seen their economies thrive. China's economy surpassed Japan's over the past year to become the world's second biggest; Brazil's overtook the U.K.'s to take sixth place.

"It is a different picture and reflects the fact that (developing) economies are not only the largest and fastest growing economies but are among the biggest economies in the world," said Uri Dadush, director of the international economics program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "Clearly, neither the Americans nor the Europeans are in any position to tell the biggest economies what to do."

Mexican President Felipe Calderon cut to the point while speaking to reporters Tuesday afternoon as he noted developing world contributions to the IMF for a possible European bailout. Although the countries still have lower standards of living, their economies are growing and many have amassed large foreign reserves.

China had pledged $43 billion to the fund, while India, Mexico, Brazil and Russia each chipped in $10 billion. The United States, Calderon drily noted, was not giving a single penny, due to "serious restrictions of a legal and political nature." In other words, coughing up billions to save Europe was impossible for deadlocked U.S. politicians, especially in an election year and as the country struggled with its own budget deficits, economic analysts said.

University of Maryland economist Phillip Swagel, a former Treasury Department official in the George W. Bush administration, said developing countries' new economic power was already translating into growing political might.

In fact, the BRICS countries representing Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa were the ones making demands on Europe during the summit, saying they should be given a bigger role in the governance of the IMF if they were going to send billions to the fund. Europeans have traditionally led the organization since its founding nearly seven decades ago.

"With their resources comes a greater say," Swagel said. "It's a big change. We were once telling Asian counties what to do."

The power shift was clear in the air-conditioned hallways and balmy outdoor lounges of the G-20 where dignitaries and reporters mingled.

News crews from Ethiopia and China filled press conferences, while Brazilian and Russian leaders drew the most attention. Humbled European heads of state stepped before TV cameras to thank China for helping out while promising that their countries would do better.

Heloisa Castro, a Washington-based reporter for the Brazilian network Record TV, said Brazilians were energized by their new prominence, after so many decades of suffering dreadful busts and booms. Still, she said, they had no right to preach solutions to Europe, a point President Dilma Rousseff made to an international gaggle of reporters Tuesday.

Preventing European and U.S. turmoil from dragging down Brazil was the order of the day, Castro said, as economic growth in some developing countries has slowed sharply this year.

"I think it's very curious that now, we who have been through all these IMF adjustment programs in the past with their draconian conditions, we now are seeing European countries go through the same thing," Castro said. "But if the economies in Europe and the U.S. go down, we all suffer. We can't only live with the BRICS countries."

Associated Press

barry larkin jay z new song torrie wilson alabama lsu bcs national championship bcs championship bcs national championship 2012

E-voting: trust but verify

With the Presidential elections looming up, some have been asking why the United States is not making more of electronic voting. It?s being adopted in many other countries around the world, with India, Brazil, Estonia, Norway and Switzerland as notable examples.?? However, the United States has several examples in recent years where it has backed out of electronic voting that it had already implemented.

For example, in 2010, a trial system for remote voting over the Internet in Washington DC (known as the ?Digital vote by mail?) was shown to be vulnerable, when it was penetrated by a research team from the University of Michigan, demonstrating how a real attack could render any results unsound, without detection. The attack was documented in a recent paper by researchers from the University of Michigan.

So who is right?

First, it?s important to differentiate between the types of e-voting.? To some it means using controlled kiosks in polling stations which collect the votes locally. For others it means those kiosks sending the votes to some central collection system.? To others, e-voting is about being able to vote remotely, typically over the Internet.? In all cases, the key element of e-voting is that the vote is captured and processed electronically.? This has several perceived benefits:

  1. More people will be minded to vote.? This has obvious advantages as the turnout in developed democracies around the world is often very disappointing, except in countries where it is a legal requirement to vote, such as Austrlia.
  2. Accessibility: technology can assist blind and partially sighted voters, and those with mobility impairments, to cast their vote.? It can also offer instructions in a range of languages without the cost of printing large numbers of ballot forms in each language.
  3. Handling votes at long distances can be done much more quickly and reliably.? Voters can vote from anywhere in the world without the need to post ballots or ship ballot boxes.

Given that we already do online banking and shopping, and even remotely vote for popular TV shows, what?s so different about electing our politicians through electronic voting?

It comes down to two principles which are peculiar to these types of elections:

  1. Guarantee of integrity with verifiability: an individual who votes needs to be sure that their vote was cast for the person they intended, and has been lodged appropriately. Stories abound from some voters that a system they were using has thanked them for casting their vote for a candidate that they didn?t believe they had voted for, and they have not been able to rectify the situation. There will always be tension within this principle, as security and usability are often seen as opposing forces in system design.
  2. Secrecy: online transactions at present, including voting for your favourite act on a TV show, will involve some form of receipt so that the user can see if something has gone wrong.? In a voting system, issuing this kind of thing means that some form of audit trail will also be formed, which can tie your action (how you voted) to you personally.? Obviously this is something you don?t want in a ?secret ballot?.? This is possibly the hardest aspect to ?guarantee? in an electronic system.

The key difference between this and, say, online banking rests on the fact that we can check bank statements and retain records of? transactions, which lets us catch any errors and unauthorised transactions.?? We can?t do this for voting systems because of the need for ballot secrecy, so we have to trust the voting system instead.?? This is like running your bank account without getting statements or receipts, and trusting the bank to keep track of your balance accurately.

The Holy Grail for electronic voting is ?verifiability? which provides the highest level of trust by publishing the election data in a way that can be checked independently.? Finding a way to do this is a challenge, but some systems have been proposed which make use of cryptography to secure votes while preventing them from being changed, whilst allowing vote processing to be done in an open and verifiable way.

Scantegrity were the first to run a municipal election in this way, at Takoma Park in November 2009 (and again in 2011), which was independently audited and resulted in no serious objections.? Similarly, Helios has run several verifiable elections over the Internet, the largest being for the election of the Recteur (Principal) of the Catholic University of Louvain in Belgium.

Another voter-verifiable system is Pr?t ? Voter, originally proposed by Peter Ryan of the University of Luxembourg, and which is currently being implemented by the University of Surrey.?? In Pr?t ? Voter, ?verification? comprises publishing each step in the election process, from the point where the vote is first cast right through to the final tally.? It?s just like paper based elections where observers can see votes physically placed in the ballot boxes and watch that they are not tampered with throughout the collection and counting process.

Pr?t???Voter makes use of cryptographic techniques to preserve the secrecy of the ballot.? It secures the information so that it cannot be tampered with, nor can the person who cast the vote claim it wasn?t them that made a specific vote.? All of this is done in such a way that voters can track their vote without providing a casual observer with the linkage between individuals and a specific vote.? ? The processing steps come with mathematical proofs that the votes have been processed, decrypted and tallied correctly.

It?s clear that successful e-voting systems work on the principle of ?assume voters will trust but allow them to verify if they wish?. As more e-voting is implemented using this this principle it will become something demanded by voters, as it is not just an automated version of the current manual systems, but something that offers truly verifiable democracy. In an era when people are jaded about the political process, that must surely be a good thing.

?

mike adams janoris jenkins john edwards trial brandon weeden felicia day nfl 2012 draft miami dolphins